Friday, May 24, 2013 • ?????? 15-ŃĚČ-1434 ĺÜ

Home
Articles
Authors
News
Forums
Have Your Say
Audio
Events
Top 10
About Us and How You Can Help
Link to Us
Feedback

Print This Article
Send to a Friend
Add to Favourites
 
More Articles by Idrees Palmer
 
Most read articles in Refutations or Claimants to Salafiyah



 


Add to Bookmarks - Make this your Home Page  
Articles Refutations Claimants to Salafiyah

[29. Questions without answers]
277813 Reads
 
Contents
Annihilation of Abu Khadijah
[2. Labelling people as “Sururis”]
[3. The intent behind Sheikh Ali at-Tamimi’s original email]
[4. Who promotes conspiracy theories?]
[5. Use, misuse and abuse of the term “Salafi”]
[6. Their failure to recognise some of the senior scholars of our time, due to partisanship]
[7. Sheikh al-Albaani’s praise and criticism]
[8. Sheikh al-Albaani’s praise of al-Madkhali]
[9. Accusation of Safar and Salmaan supporting the New World Order]
[10. From the lies upon Safar and Salmaan]
[11. The position of the senior scholars regarding Safar and Salmaan]
[12. Position of Sheikh Ibn Baaz regarding Safar and Salmaan’s imprisonment]
[13. Sheikh Ibn Baaz’s criticism of Muqbil’s book]
[14. Sheikh Ibn Baaz and Ibn Uthaimeen – Voting in elections]
[15. Accusation against Ali at-Tamimi of seeking to renew Islaamic Fiqh for the 20th century]
[16. Abandonment of Jihad in our time and its attribution to Salafiyah]
[17. Declaration of Muslim masses as innovators]
[18. Prohibition of being aware of the current events]
[19. The claim that to rule by secular laws is only a major sin and not Kufr]
[20. Rabee is allowed to preach Salafiyah in the Baatini state of Qadhaafi - Libya]
[21. Kibaar condemn Muraad Shukri and his supporter Ali al-Halabi, of Irjaa]
[22. Who truly refutes the innovators, and who aids them?]
[23. Do the scholars agree with everything that Rabee has to say?]
[24. The scholar’s criticism of Rabee’s attacks on Sayyid Qutub]
[25. Differentiation between the Saved and the Victorious group]
Missing text - [26. False accusation on Ali at-Tamimi of lying upon Sheikh Ibn Baaz regarding the “Declaration and Clarification” signed by 33 students of knowledge in Kuwait]
[27. About the categorisation of Tawheed]
[28. Attacks upon the senior scholars]
[29. Questions without answers]
[30. al-Ghunaymaan and Ibn Baaz on categorisation of Tawheed]
[31. Ibn Baaz’s praise and recommendation for Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq’s work “as-Siraat”]
[32. An acknowledgement that Ibn Baaz recommended Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq’s book to be read]
[33. Conclusion and some shocking facts]

He then says:

"You should sit with Shaykh Ali Hasan al-Halabee and Shaykh Saleem al-Hilaalee and Shaykh Abu Anas Hamad al-Uthmaan and put your claims to
them next time they come to the West and maybe they can clear your
confusion brother."

A word to the wise; follow your own advice. In fact, if anyone is stumbling in confusion, it is yourself. Indeed, your inability to respond to the aforementioned Kuwaiti document is matched only by your inability to respond to specific questions I asked you and Amjad over two years ago, where in a message dated 96-10-15 09:18:19 EDT, Amjad wrote:

"I haven't forgotten your post and do intend to reply. However since I do not have the capacity to answer some of the things you have mentioned in your posts regarding Burjis, Rabee and others whom you alluded to (such as Abdullaah al-Farsee etc.) - your messages (and also mine so they understand the course of the discussion) have been passed on to them via fax. I await their response to your emails and the statements you made regarding their manhaj and aqeedah etc... Once I get the reply, I will post it inshaa'allaah. Until then, please have patience."


Subscribe to
Our Mailing List:
subscribe
unsubscribe



 

 

 

 

Warning: mysql_free_result() expects parameter 1 to be resource, null given in /home/sahwah/public_html/viewarticle.php on line 719