Sunday, May 19, 2013 • ????? 10-ŃĚČ-1434 ĺÜ

Home
Articles
Authors
News
Forums
Have Your Say
Audio
Events
Top 10
About Us and How You Can Help
Link to Us
Feedback

Print This Article
Send to a Friend
Add to Favourites
 
More Articles by Idrees Palmer
 
Most read articles in Refutations or Claimants to Salafiyah



 


Add to Bookmarks - Make this your Home Page  
Articles Refutations Claimants to Salafiyah

[3. The intent behind Sheikh Ali at-Tamimi’s original email]
275961 Reads
 
Contents
Annihilation of Abu Khadijah
[2. Labelling people as “Sururis”]
[3. The intent behind Sheikh Ali at-Tamimi’s original email]
[4. Who promotes conspiracy theories?]
[5. Use, misuse and abuse of the term “Salafi”]
[6. Their failure to recognise some of the senior scholars of our time, due to partisanship]
[7. Sheikh al-Albaani’s praise and criticism]
[8. Sheikh al-Albaani’s praise of al-Madkhali]
[9. Accusation of Safar and Salmaan supporting the New World Order]
[10. From the lies upon Safar and Salmaan]
[11. The position of the senior scholars regarding Safar and Salmaan]
[12. Position of Sheikh Ibn Baaz regarding Safar and Salmaan’s imprisonment]
[13. Sheikh Ibn Baaz’s criticism of Muqbil’s book]
[14. Sheikh Ibn Baaz and Ibn Uthaimeen – Voting in elections]
[15. Accusation against Ali at-Tamimi of seeking to renew Islaamic Fiqh for the 20th century]
[16. Abandonment of Jihad in our time and its attribution to Salafiyah]
[17. Declaration of Muslim masses as innovators]
[18. Prohibition of being aware of the current events]
[19. The claim that to rule by secular laws is only a major sin and not Kufr]
[20. Rabee is allowed to preach Salafiyah in the Baatini state of Qadhaafi - Libya]
[21. Kibaar condemn Muraad Shukri and his supporter Ali al-Halabi, of Irjaa]
[22. Who truly refutes the innovators, and who aids them?]
[23. Do the scholars agree with everything that Rabee has to say?]
[24. The scholar’s criticism of Rabee’s attacks on Sayyid Qutub]
[25. Differentiation between the Saved and the Victorious group]
Missing text - [26. False accusation on Ali at-Tamimi of lying upon Sheikh Ibn Baaz regarding the “Declaration and Clarification” signed by 33 students of knowledge in Kuwait]
[27. About the categorisation of Tawheed]
[28. Attacks upon the senior scholars]
[29. Questions without answers]
[30. al-Ghunaymaan and Ibn Baaz on categorisation of Tawheed]
[31. Ibn Baaz’s praise and recommendation for Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq’s work “as-Siraat”]
[32. An acknowledgement that Ibn Baaz recommended Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq’s book to be read]
[33. Conclusion and some shocking facts]

"Asslaamu alaykum 

The following is a reply to brother Ali Timeemee's recent outburst on the net - yet again trying to confuse sincere young Salafi brothers and sisters who trying to gain beneficial knowledge about their Lord, their Deen, their Messenger and the way of the Salaf."

This demonstrates Abu Khadeejah's deception. Br. Ali's e-mail on Dec. 20 was on the topic of Sh. Ibn Baaz and Sh. Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq. The e-mail pointed out Sh. Ibn Baaz's tazkiyah of Sh. Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq's book entitled "as-Siraat." Sh. Ibn Baaz encouraged the printing and the distribution of the book. Thus will Abu Khadeejah follow Sh. Ibn Baaz's advice? Will he place its translation on his "Salafi Publications" web site? Or will he publicly admit what he privately told Ali in the spring of 96, that they [the brothers in the UK] were taught that "Sh. Ibn Baaz was weak in manhaj" and that Sh. Ibn Uthaimeen was "a plaything in the hands of the Surooris"? Instead of hiding behind the cloaks of these and other scholars will these youth not truly explain their manhaj regarding these matters (like the one regarding Sh. Ibn Baaz's praise of Sh. Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq's book) rather than teaching one thing in public while holding another view in private? Most likely Abu Khadeejah will skirt away from this issue as he has others.


Subscribe to
Our Mailing List:
subscribe
unsubscribe



 

 

 

 

Warning: mysql_free_result() expects parameter 1 to be resource, null given in /home/sahwah/public_html/viewarticle.php on line 719