Ali then said:

"Indeed, we had the declaration of the 33 Kuwaiti students of knowledge  which refuted all their main notions and to which was appended Ibn Baz's approval."

[Abu Khadijah replies]

"My Response: Why do you mix truth with falsehood, fear Allaah"

Indeed, it is YOU who should fear Allah, for it was YOU who passed off the pusillanimous lie which you posted two years ago during Ramadhan on the Essex website (now "Salafipublications") which you had previously circulated in December 1996, where you claimed that Sh. Ibn Baz's praise and approval of the Kuwaiti document of 26 of Rabi' I, 1415 AH (A Declaration and Clarification Regarding Some of What is Occurring in the Da'wa Field in Kuwait), is, "A Surooori Forgery upon Shaikh Bin Baz."

You state:

<missing text>

To demonstrate your ignorance of current events, the Arabic language as well as your blind frenzy to discredit and slander Ali Al-Timimi, you first confused (a) Sh. Ibn Baz's negation of his approval of the SECOND memorandum of advice
("Mudhakiraat an-Naseehah", dated 19/3/1413 AH) forwarded by Saudi scholars to King Fahd, with (b) the Kuwaiti Declaration ("Bayan wa Towdheeh") TWO YEARS LATER, signed by 33 Kuwaiti students of knowledge, referring to the fitna in Kuwait; Sh. Ibn Baz approved and signed this document, (dated 7/5/1415 AH, document #994/kh).

You then deliberately highlighted certain ambiguous sentences within Sh. Ibn Baz's negation in order to maliciously deceive some naive youth into thinking that Sh. Ibn Baz's negation was written specifically to refute Ali Al-Timimi. Don't waste time with denials, as it is common knowledge that this took place in December 1996 when you vigorously circulated this text with the allegation that "Ibn Baz wrote a fatwa against Ali Al-Timimi." In fact, this highlighting still remains on your website for anyone to see. For example, you highlighted the following sentences:

* "...of the claim of the liar (za'mi kaadhibin) that Shaikh Abdul Azeez Bin Abdullah Bin Baaz - the General President for the Centre for Islamic Researches, Iftaa, Call and Guidance - has given it tazkiyyah (purification) [qad zakkaahaa]"

* "...what the treatise contains of falsehood [baatil], the opposite of the true state of affairs and the way in which it has been prepared and spread/published..."

* "...have worked to spread and further the causes of disunity, grudges, false accusations of blame/defects, or [have worked] to make such things materialise... and this gives evidence to the evil intent of the one who prepared it or to his ignorance of the state of affairs and to [the] deceiving of some of those who collaborated with them in [preparing] it...then it confirms and assures that this action is in opposition to the manhaj [methodology] of the legislated manner of giving advice [naseehah]"

* "...just as it warns from the various types of engagements [in] the deviated thoughts and holding onto the [fundamental] principles of groups [jamaa'aat] and sects [ahzaab] that are foreign."

I ask, is this type of cheap, deliberate deception, from the actions of the Salaf? On the contrary, the selecting of ambiguous statements in Ibn Baz's document to insinuate that the Shaykh was specifically replying to Ali Al-Timimi, is from the actions of con-artists, charlatans and the worst groups of Ahlul Bid'ah like the Rawafidh and the Sufis. Will you now publicly repent from your Ramadhan scandal and admit that Ali did not make the forgery of Ibn Baz's approval?