Thursday, May 23, 2013 • ?????? 14-ŃĚČ-1434 ĺÜ

Home
Articles
Authors
News
Forums
Have Your Say
Audio
Events
Top 10
About Us and How You Can Help
Link to Us
Feedback

Print This Article
Send to a Friend
Add to Favourites
 
More Articles by Idrees Palmer
 
Most read articles in Refutations or Claimants to Salafiyah



 


Add to Bookmarks - Make this your Home Page  
Articles Refutations Claimants to Salafiyah

[7. Sheikh al-Albaani’s praise and criticism]
277474 Reads
 
Contents
Annihilation of Abu Khadijah
[2. Labelling people as “Sururis”]
[3. The intent behind Sheikh Ali at-Tamimi’s original email]
[4. Who promotes conspiracy theories?]
[5. Use, misuse and abuse of the term “Salafi”]
[6. Their failure to recognise some of the senior scholars of our time, due to partisanship]
[7. Sheikh al-Albaani’s praise and criticism]
[8. Sheikh al-Albaani’s praise of al-Madkhali]
[9. Accusation of Safar and Salmaan supporting the New World Order]
[10. From the lies upon Safar and Salmaan]
[11. The position of the senior scholars regarding Safar and Salmaan]
[12. Position of Sheikh Ibn Baaz regarding Safar and Salmaan’s imprisonment]
[13. Sheikh Ibn Baaz’s criticism of Muqbil’s book]
[14. Sheikh Ibn Baaz and Ibn Uthaimeen – Voting in elections]
[15. Accusation against Ali at-Tamimi of seeking to renew Islaamic Fiqh for the 20th century]
[16. Abandonment of Jihad in our time and its attribution to Salafiyah]
[17. Declaration of Muslim masses as innovators]
[18. Prohibition of being aware of the current events]
[19. The claim that to rule by secular laws is only a major sin and not Kufr]
[20. Rabee is allowed to preach Salafiyah in the Baatini state of Qadhaafi - Libya]
[21. Kibaar condemn Muraad Shukri and his supporter Ali al-Halabi, of Irjaa]
[22. Who truly refutes the innovators, and who aids them?]
[23. Do the scholars agree with everything that Rabee has to say?]
[24. The scholar’s criticism of Rabee’s attacks on Sayyid Qutub]
[25. Differentiation between the Saved and the Victorious group]
Missing text - [26. False accusation on Ali at-Tamimi of lying upon Sheikh Ibn Baaz regarding the “Declaration and Clarification” signed by 33 students of knowledge in Kuwait]
[27. About the categorisation of Tawheed]
[28. Attacks upon the senior scholars]
[29. Questions without answers]
[30. al-Ghunaymaan and Ibn Baaz on categorisation of Tawheed]
[31. Ibn Baaz’s praise and recommendation for Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq’s work “as-Siraat”]
[32. An acknowledgement that Ibn Baaz recommended Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq’s book to be read]
[33. Conclusion and some shocking facts]

"As for Shaykh Muqbil and Shaykh Rabee, then Shakkh Al-Albaanee has mentioned that the ones who criticises them is a person following his desires (hawa)"

This shows the ignorance of this person. Are Muqbil and Rabee prophets and hence infallible from error? And does this mean that Bakr Abu Zaid and Ibn Jibrin are people following desires? If so, then this would mean that Al-Albani himself is also following his desires as he criticizes what Rabi has written about Sayyid Qutub when Adnaa Aroor read him a section of that book.

Al-Albaani then goes on to praise Sayyid Qutub's tafseer and suggests that all Salafis should read a chapter from Milestones. Will the ignorant one follow Sh. al-Albaani's advice and place that chapter on his website or is this just another example of them claiming to follow the shuyookh but in reality only taking what follows their own perverted desires?


Subscribe to
Our Mailing List:
subscribe
unsubscribe



 

 

 

 

Warning: mysql_free_result() expects parameter 1 to be resource, null given in /home/sahwah/public_html/viewarticle.php on line 719