Ali then said:
"Another manifestation of the new world order in which we find ourselves and to which I and other brothers have commented on this forum for the past few years is the re-interpretation of concepts of the Islamic religion in order to support the new world order in the name of the Sunna and Salafiya. The scholars we refer to are Shaykh al-Albaanee, Shaykh Ibn Baaz, Shaykh ibn Al-Uthaymeen, Shaykh Saaleh Fawzaan, Shaykh Rabee ibn Haadee, Shaykh Muqbil ibn Waadiee, Shaykh Ubayd al-Jaabiree and their likes"
[To which Abu Khadijah replies]
"- These are not from the new world order but from the way of the 'old' (qadeemi) order known as the salafus-Saalih."
As one can see, this is a nonsensical statement. One wonders as to why do these brothers jump from "Shaykh al-Albaanee, Shaykh Ibn Baaz, Shaykh ibn Al-Uthaymeen, Shaykh Saaleh Fawzaan" to "Shaykh Rabee ibn Haadee, Shaykh Muqbil ibn Waadiee, Shaykh Ubayd al-Jaabiree." Why is it that they skip over other major scholars in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia who are part of Hay'a Kibar al-'Ulama like Sh. Bakr Abu Zaid, Sh. Ibn Jibreen, and Sh. al-Qu'ood? Is it because these latter scholars hold views which are in opposition of this group and hence this group privately holds them to be astray? Moreover, what is the ignorant one's position and explanation regarding Muqbil's position toward the Saudi government where Muqbil prays to Allah for its downfall and praises Juhayman who took over the Haram in the first weeks of 1400?